Dandello,
Thank you for explaining why those javascripts are listed in a YaBB template. I wasn't aware of this, but of course it makes sense. Our YaBB 2.4 only has the
YaBB.js template listed.
At one point I inadvertently deleted the following lines of code from our forum while I was adding something to the template, which of course messed things up a lot:
<link href=".../yabbfiles/greybox/gb_styles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<script language="JavaScript1.2" type="text/javascript" src=".../yabbfiles/YaBB.js"></script>
<script language="JavaScript1.2" type="text/javascript">
Within a few minutes, however, I was able to see what I had done by comparing a backup copy of our template with the one that I had messed up;
side by side.
Fixed!Subsequently, out of curiosity I looked at the source code of some other YaBB forums I liked (
2.5 versus my 2.4) to see what they had in the way of javascripts, and added those lines of code (
referencing our own domain of course). But one or more of those added lines of code either messed up our forum, or they didn't seem to do anything at all, so line by line I removed the added code until I was back to what we originally had.
Clearly, I think, there are enough differences between 2.4 and 2.5
NOT to do what I tried to do.
Hint to self:
Upgrade! 
On another matter, which I just noticed since I'm still stinging with embarrassment because I once referred to you as a
"he" instead of a
"she" ...
a typical, and unacceptable presumption that society often makes, and I was no different ... I see that this particular forum doesn't list our gender identification even when we list it ourselves.
So where you should have a
icon, and I should have a
icon underneath our names after our location in every post we make, those icons aren't appearing.
No biggie; just something I now noticed.
Now that I'm thinking about it, regarding gender identification, I recall that the
generic gender that was chosen in Glamour Magazine years ago was always a woman instead of a man as pretty much all other publications did it the latter way (
at least throughout the early 90's).
As an example, when there was reference to a doctor or a lawyer, or pretty much any other profession for that matter, and no actual person was being referenced, whereas other publications simply presumed that this person would be a man, Glamour magazine would presume her to be a woman.
But I digress.
Pages: 
Threads not visable to non members. (Read 3,047 times)
